The Global Warming Challenge

Evidence-based forecasting for climate change

longines,tissot,fake rolex for sale,rolex day date,zenith,rolex datejust,cartier,omega,replica watches,u boat,rolex milgauss,patek philippe,rolex masterpiece,montblanc,rolex replica,a lange sohne,panerai,tag heuer


with 3 comments


The original Global Warming Challenge from Scott Armstrong to Al Gore was posted on this site in June 2007. With the original challenge deadline being on December 1, 2007, as of November 28th, 2007, the challenge was simplified and the deadline was extended to March 26th, 2008. March 26th passed, and Armstrong sent another letter to Mr. Gore, asking the key question: “When and under what conditions would you be willing to engage in a scientific test of your forecasts?”

The Challenge

Scott Armstrong of the Wharton School challenges Al Gore $20,000 that he will be able to make more accurate forecasts of annual mean temperatures than those that can be produced by climate models. Scott Armstrong’s forecasts will be based on the naive (no-change) model; that is, the forecasts would be the same as the most recent year prior to the forecasts. The money will be placed in a Charitable Trust to be established at a brokerage house. The charity designated by the winner will receive the total value in the fund when the official award is made at the annual International Symposium on Forecasting in 2018.

To determine the progress and outcome of The Challenge, we use the UAH (University of Alabama at Hunstville) lower troposphere series because it is, (1) fully disclosed, (2) global due to the comprehensive coverage by satellites, (3) avoids local effects such as encroachment by buildings, tarmac, and other heat sources, and (4) avoids inconsistent measurement such as move from mercury max/min thermometers to faster responding electronic systems in recent decades and the elimination of many sites. A disadvantage for some purposes is that is only 3 decades or so of data, but that is not a problem for The Challenge.

The IPCC rely on the Hadley series, which fails on all 4 of the above criteria, as does the NOAA series which uses a similar approach. We nevertheless used the Hadley series in our published papers to test the IPCC predictive validity.

Hadley (University of East Anglia and the UK Met Office) take manually recorded temperatures from 1850 from various selected locations around the world and then adjust them. Temperatures over oceans are traditionally measured by throwing buckets over the sides of ships. Both the selection of locations and the adjustment process are not fully disclosed.

• Green & Armstrong chapter: Forecasting global climate change: A scientific approach

• Green & Armstrong paper: Global Warming: Forecasts by Scientists versus Scientific Forecasts

• Official homepage of the challenge: Public Policy Forecasting Site
• University of Alabama at Huntsville (UAH) lower troposphere temperature series

For more about Professor J. Scott Armstrong, see his homepage.

Last updated January 12, 2016.

Written by climatebet

June 16th, 2007 at 3:08 pm

Posted in

3 Responses to 'Challenge'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Challenge'.

  1. […] Forecasting Webseite präsentieren. Scott Armstrong fordert in diesem Zusammenhang Al Gore zu einer 20000$ Wette heraus, die er gewinnt, wenn er es schaffen sollte, den Klimawandel besser als die gegenwärtig […]

  2. its amazing how a paper called a “scientific paper” doesnt have one chart or statistical study or any sort of analytical content stating facts.

    abdul bijur

    20 May 08 at 4:38 am

  3. you have a good site ive bookmarked it will look forward to updates to come


    30 Aug 09 at 11:45 pm

Leave a Reply